Comparison of Total Bacterial Count in Contact Lenses with Different Treatments of Contact Lens Solutions

Authors

  • Hanna Nurul Husna Department of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
  • Dewi Veti Virgianti Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Universitas Bakti Tunas Husada, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
  • Sindiyni Wini Lestari Department of Optometry, Universitas Bakti Tunas Husada, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31965/infokes.Vol22.Iss4.1319

Keywords:

Bacteria, Contact Lens, Solutions, Total Plate Count

Abstract

The use of contact lenses continues to increase, raising attention to aspects of eye health because of their hygienic factors. The hygiene of contact lenses comes not only from the way they are treated but also from the soaking fluid. This study aimed to determine the total bacterial count on contact lenses with and without the use of immersion solutions. The research method used is a comparative descriptive research method that compares the two pairs of contact lenses with two different contact lens solutions. The total bacterial count was calculated using the total plate count (TPC) method. The number of bacterial colonies for contact lenses before being immersed in liquid A was found in dilution 10-2 with an amount of 4.4×103 CFU/mL, and after soaking, it was in dilution 10-1 with an amount of 8.5×102 CFU/mL. The number of bacterial colonies on contact lenses before being immersed in B liquid was found in 10-1 dilution with an amount of 1.3×103 CFU/mL, and after being soaked, the average colony was 3.9×104 CFU/mL. From these results, it can be seen that in contact lenses and liquid A, there is a decrease in the number of bacterial colonies, while on the other hand, in liquid B, there is an increase in the number of bacterial colonies. The causal factor is thought to originate from the composition of the solutions. However, do not rule out contamination from bottles and contact lens care. Therefore, this research can be used as a basis for hygiene education in contact lenses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barr, J. T., Lapple, W. J., Snyder, C. A., Hsu, J. C., & Tuovinen, O. H. (1988). Evaluation of Contact Lenses by Microbial Enumeration and Protein Determination. Optometry and Vision Science, 65(6), 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198806000-00007

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Benefits of Vision Correction with Contact Lenses. CDC. Retrieved from: https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/contactlenses/benefits.html

Clark, B. J., Harkins, L. S., Munro, F. A., & Devonshire, P. (1994). Microbial contamination of cases used for storing contact lenses. Journal of Infection, 28(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-4453(94)91893-7

Donzis, P. B., Mondino, B. J., Weissman, B. A., & Bruckner, D. A. (1987). Microbial Contamination of Contact Lens Care Systems. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 104(4), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(87)90219-4

Durban, J. J., Villaverde, E. H., Monteoliva-Sanchez, M., & Ramos-Cormenzana, A. (1996). Bacterial Contamination of Hydrophilic Contact Lens Solutions Marketed in Spain. Optometry and Vision Science, 73(8), 529–532. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199608000-00002

Eryılmaz, M., Kaskatepe, B., Kıymacı, M. E., Sımsek, D., & Erol, H. B. (2018). Antimicrobial efficacies of four multi-purpose contact lens care solutions. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 42(2), 15-22. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jfpanu/issue/42664/514443

Hadeel T AL-Hadithi, & Zahira M AL-Khani. (2023). Efficacy of two contact lens disinfecting solutions in reducing growth rate of bacteria and eradication of biofilms. World Journal of Biological and Pharmaceutical Research, 4(1), 016–023. https://doi.org/10.53346/wjbpr.2023.4.1.0048

Ibrahim, R. A., Husna, H. N., & Witjaksono, A. (2021). Hubungan Pengetahuan Pengguna Lensa Kontak dengan Kejadian Dry Eyes. Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic, 5(2), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.33377/jkh.v5i2.101

Iguban, E. B., & Nanagas, J. P. R. (2016). The In Vitro Anti-Microbial Activity of Multipurpose Contact Lens Solutions against Standard Strains of Common Ocular Pathogens: The Effect of Duration from First Use. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 7(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9570.1000560

Indrayati, S., & Amelia, A. (2020). Uji Daya Hambat Cairan Pembersih Lensa Kontak Dalam Menghambat Pertumbuhan Staphylococcus aureus. Prosiding Seminar Kesehatan Perintis, 2(1), 18-24. Retrieved from: https://jurnal.upertis.ac.id/index.php/PSKP/article/view/327

Jamilatun, M., & Lukito, P. I. (2024). Total plate count and yeast mold count in liquid traditional medicine (Jamu) sold in the sukoharjo region market. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 12(4), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijobas.v12i4.282

Laili, N. H., Abida, I. W., & Junaedi, A. S. (2022). Nilai Total Plate Count (TPC) Dan Jumlah Jenis Bakteri Air Limbah Cucian Garam (Bittern) Dari Tambak Garam Desa Banyuajuh Kecamatan Kamal Kabupaten Bangkalan. Juvenil:Jurnal Ilmiah Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 3(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.21107/juvenil.v3i1.15075

McAnally, C., Walters, R., Campolo, A., Harris, V., King, J., Thomas, M., Gabriel, M. M., Shannon, P., & Crary, M. (2021). Antimicrobial Efficacy of Contact Lens Solutions Assessed by ISO Standards. Microorganisms, 9(10), 2173. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102173

Raksha, L., Gangashettappa, N., Shantala, G., Nandan, B., & Sinha, D. (2020). Study of biofilm formation in bacterial isolates from contact lens wearers. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_947_19

ResearchAndMarkets.com. (2023). The Worldwide Therapeutic Contact Lenses Industry is Expected to Reach $4.2 Billion by 2027: Public and Private Initiatives to Increase Vision Care Awareness Drives Growth. Business Wire.

Rizki, Z., Fitriana, F., & Jumadewi, A. (2022). Identifikasi jumlah angka kuman pada dispenser metode TPC (Total Plate Count). Jurnal SAGO Gizi Dan Kesehatan, 4(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.30867/gikes.v4i1.1052

Statista Market Insight. (2022). Contact Lenses - Indonesia. Statista. Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/eyewear/contact-lenses/indonesia#revenue

Szczotka-Flynn, L. B., Pearlman, E., & Ghannoum, M. (2010). Microbial Contamination of Contact Lenses, Lens Care Solutions, and Their Accessories: A Literature Review. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, 36(2), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181d20cae

Tapotubun, A. M., Rieuwpassa, F., Matrutty, T. E., Nanlohy, H., & Apituley, Y. M. (2024). Total Plate Count of Traditionally Produced Smoked Skipjack in Ambon. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1329(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1329/1/012012

Waghmare, S. V, & Jeria, S. (2022). A Review of Contact Lens-Related Risk Factors and Complications. Cureus,14(10): e30118. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30118

Weisbarth, R. E., Gabriel, M. M., George, M., Rappon, J., Miller, M., Chalmers, R., & Winterton, L. (2007). Creating Antimicrobial Surfaces and Materials for Contact Lenses and Lens Cases. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, 33(6), 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e318157f488

Willcox, M. D., Harmis, N. Y., & Holden, B. A. (2002). Bacterial populations on high‐Dk silicone hydrogel contact lenses: effect of length of wear in asymptomatic patients. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 85(3), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2002.tb03031.x

Downloads

Published

2024-12-17

How to Cite

Husna, H. N., Virgianti, D. V., & Lestari, S. W. (2024). Comparison of Total Bacterial Count in Contact Lenses with Different Treatments of Contact Lens Solutions. JURNAL INFO KESEHATAN, 22(4), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.31965/infokes.Vol22.Iss4.1319

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.